Free Speech

How can we protect expression while taking harm seriously?

Freedom of expression includes the ability to challenge authority and share unwelcome views. Discomfort, criticism, threats and incitement are not interchangeable. We can ask what restriction is proposed, what harm it addresses and who can review it. A person's dignity does not make their ideas immune to criticism. Legal standards need their own jurisdiction-specific examination; courtesy is not a condition for having a voice.

A question to sit with (optional): Are we responding to disagreement, demonstrable harm or an attempt to silence scrutiny?