Truth

How do I distinguish what I know from what I believe or interpret?

A statement about what happened, an explanation of why and a judgment about what matters are different claims. Evidence can support some more strongly than others. The framework invites honesty about uncertainty without turning well-supported facts into optional opinions. Admitting that we do not know is useful when it is accurate; so is stating clearly what the evidence does establish.

A question to sit with (optional): What exactly can I support, and which part am I adding as interpretation?